|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 127-133
Assessment of locomotion behavior in adult Zebrafish after acute exposure to different pharmacological reference compounds
Pankaj Gupta1, Shailaja B Khobragade2, Vyas M Shingatgeri2, Srinivisan M Rajaram3
1 Drug Safety Evaluation, Ranbaxy Research Laboratories, Gurgaon, Haryana; Central Research Institute for Homoeopathy, Drug Standardisation Unit, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Drug Safety Evaluation, Ranbaxy Research Laboratories, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
3 Laboratory Animal Medicine Unit, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
|Date of Web Publication||27-Aug-2014|
Research Officer (Pharmacology), Central Research Institute for Homoeopathy, Sec-24, Noida - 201 301, Uttar Pradesh
Source of Support: Ranbaxy Research Laboratories., Conflict of Interest: None
Objectives: The objective of the present study was to assess locomotor behavior of adult zebrafish after acute exposure to different pharmacological reference compounds. Materials and Methods: Adult zebrafish of 4-5-months-old were exposed to different concentrations of known reference compounds for 15 min. The test was conducted separately for each drug concentration as well as control. Locomotor activity parameters viz. distance travelled, speed, total mobile time, and total immobile time were recorded for each animal during the exposure period. Results: Out of 11 compounds tested, nine compounds showed decrease in locomotor behavior with significant changes in distance travelled, speed, total mobile time, and total immobile time. Caffeine exhibited biphasic response in locomotion behavior, while scopolamine failed to induce any significant changes. Conclusion: In view of the above findings, these results suggested that exposure of adult zebrafish with different known compounds produce the expected changes in the locomotion behavior; therefore, adult zebrafish can be used an alternative approach for the assessment of new chemical entities for their effect on locomotor behavior.
Keywords: Caffeine, distance travelled, locomotor activity, scopolamine, speed, zebrafish
|How to cite this article:|
Gupta P, Khobragade SB, Shingatgeri VM, Rajaram SM. Assessment of locomotion behavior in adult Zebrafish after acute exposure to different pharmacological reference compounds. Drug Dev Ther 2014;5:127-33
|How to cite this URL:|
Gupta P, Khobragade SB, Shingatgeri VM, Rajaram SM. Assessment of locomotion behavior in adult Zebrafish after acute exposure to different pharmacological reference compounds. Drug Dev Ther [serial online] 2014 [cited 2017 May 27];5:127-33. Available from: http://www.ddtjournal.org/text.asp?2014/5/2/127/139626
| Introduction|| |
To date, the majority of safety issues concern with central nervous system (CNS) stimulant/depressant activity of new chemical entities (NCEs) has been evaluated using locomotor activity parameter in rodents. , During drug development, effect on locomotor activity is an undesirable property and is typically detected only in later stage of preclinical safety studies conducted on higher vertebrates.  The need for detection of these effects is essential at early stages of drug discovery.
Over the last decade, zebrafish (Danio rerio) one of the unique vertebrate models has rose to prominence for assessing drugs in vivo with respect to a wide range of toxicological and safety pharmacological evaluation because of fully sequenced genome and highly conserved genetic pathway between zebrafish and human. ,,, Recent research has revealed the emergence of zebrafish as a model for neurobehavioral studies since zebrafish larvae display learning, sleep, drug addiction, locomotor behavior, and other neurobehavioral phenotype that can be related to those seen in human. ,,,,, The overall organization of the zebrafish brain is similar to other vertebrates and the blood brain barrier is functional at 10 days post-fertilization (d.p.f.).  Zebrafish takes up hydrophilic substance easily from the water through the gills and from entire body surface which makes easy to develop CNS models in zebrafish. In this respect, recent studies identified the potential of the larvae zebrafish as well as adult zebrafish for their locomotor behavior. ,,,
As per our knowledge, very few studies have been performed and published on locomotor behavior of adult zebrafish using drugs with varied therapeutic category. Most of the studies were conducted in zebrafish larvae. From a technical point of view, the small size of larvae makes recording from multiple sites extremely difficult. The mammalian literature suggests that the response to neuroactive drugs may differ as the brain develops and it cannot be assumed that larval zebrafish show the identical response to these drugs as do adult zebrafish. 
Therefore, in this study we chose adult zebrafish as an experimental test system in contrast to zebrafish larvae to evaluate the effect of the selected pharmacological reference compounds of various therapeutic categories on locomotor behavior. The reference compounds chosen cover a broad range of therapeutic indications and pharmacological mechanisms and have been subjected to pharmacological validation studies in rodents in the past. Different locomotor activity parameters viz. distance travelled, speed, total mobile time, and total immobile time were recorded using a video tracking system and compared the data of treatment group with the respective vehicle control.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Animal and maintenance
Around 4-5-month old, stock of adult zebrafish (Danio rerio) of either sex was purchased from a local vendor (Big Fish, Gurgaon, India) and acclimatized for at least 1 month before starting the study. For all experiments zebrafish were housed in a 40-L tank, filled with deionized water maintained at 28-30°C and pH = 7.0-8.0 with constant filtration and aeration. Water conditioning and environmental quality was maintained according to the aquarium system use and care manual and The Zebrafish Book.  A dark-light cycle of 12-h light:12-h dark (on: 8:00 am; off: 20:00 pm) was maintained. Utmost care was taken to ensure that all the animals were treated humanely. Zebrafish were fed twice daily with tetrabits adult zebrafish diet (Spectrum Brands Company, Germany), and the diet was supplemented with live artemia. Behavioral testing of drug effects took place during the light phase between 10:00 am and 5:00 pm.
Chemicals and reagents
Caffeine, clonidine, chlorpromazine hydrochloride, scopolamine hydrobromide, and imipramine hydrochloride were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Bangalore, India), pentobarbitone sodium was procured from LOBA Chemi (Mumbai, India), diazepam injection (Calmpose), ramelteon, venlafaxine hydrochloride, and rasagiline were procured from Ranbaxy Research Laboratories (Gurgaon, India). All drug solutions were prepared daily in deionized water. Selection of doses was based on the literature report  and the preliminary experiments conducted in our laboratory (data not shown). Drugs and their concentrations were as follows: clonidine (100 μM), pentobarbitone (100 μM), diazepam (10 μM), ramelteon (30 μM), chlorpromazine (10 μM), rasagiline (100 μM), imipramine (30 μM), venlafaxine (100 μM), scopolamine (100 μM), and caffeine (1, 100 μM).
Locomotor activity monitoring
All the zebrafish were divided into 12 groups of 8-10/group/drug concentration except group I which contained 18 fish that served as a control group (deionized water) for all the drugs. The test was conducted separately for each drug concentration. During the test, individual fish was exposed and observed for 15 min for the control group as well as the drug treated group. For analysis of locomotor activity, swimming behavior was monitored using a video tracking system (ANY-maze 4.50, Stoelting Co., USA) and different behavior parameters, for example, distance travelled (m), speed (cm/s), total time mobile (s), and total time immobile (s) were recorded.
The mean value of distance travelled (m), speed (cm/s), and total time mobile and immobile (s) were calculated from the individual values of each fish for each drug concentration and compared with the vehicle control group (deionized water) using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's test. All data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) for group of size "n ". P < 0.05 and <0.01 was considered as the criterion for statistical significance.
| Results|| |
The effect on locomotion behavior of adult zebrafish was evaluated using clonidine (100 μM), pentobarbital (100 μM), diazepam (10 μM), ramelteon (30 μM), chlorpromazine (10 μM), rasagiline (100 μM), imipramine (30 μM), venlafaxine (100 μM), scopolamine (100 μM), and caffeine (1 and 100 μM) [Figure 1]. Different locomotor parameters, for example, distance travelled, speed, total time mobile, and total time immobile of each drug group were compared with the control group.
|Figure 1: Locomotion tracking plots of individual zebrafish in normal bath medium and in solution of different known marketed test compounds at specified concentration used in this experiment. Each fish was exposed up to 15 min in the bathing medium of control as well as test compounds. Plots were obtained from the video tracking system (ANY-MAZE 4.5)|
Click here to view
Effect on distance travelled and speed
The effect on distance travelled and speed in zebrafish is shown in [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. Clonidine (48.23 ± 5.71; 5.36 ± 0.63), pentobarbitone (38.25 ± 5.66; 6.49 ± 0.87), diazepam (58.44 ± 7.80; 4.25 ± 0.63), ramelteon (32.94 ± 3.88; 3.65 ± 0.44), chlorpromazine (40.66 ± 5.24; 4.52 ± 0.58), rasagiline (73.76 ± 12.60; 8.20 ± 1.40), imipramine (58.31 ± 10.42; 6.48 ± 1.16), and venlafaxine (30.84 ± 5.38; 3.41 ± 0.60) showed significant (P < 0.01) reduction in the distance travelled and speed, respectively, when compared to the control group (123.47 ± 6.23 and 13.71 ± 0.69, respectively) [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. We found that zebrafish exposed to selected reference compounds displayed significant decrease in speed in all the treated groups compared to control group except scopolamine (11.52 ± 0.94) which did not show any significant change in speed. Exposure to caffeine showed biphasic response, that is, at low doses (1μM) a significant (P < 0.01) CNS stimulant activity (increase in distance travelled (207.50 ± 8.93) and speed (23.06 ± 1.28)) was observed, while this stimulant effect gradually subsided to depressant effect (decrease in distance travelled (79.54 ± 3.14) and speed (8.84 ± 0.35)) significantly (P < 0.01) at higher dose (100 μM) compared to the control group. The results of caffeine produced in this study are similar to the biphasic response reported in rodents. 
|Figure 2: (a and b) Effect on distance travelled (m) of zebrafish. Distance travelled are expressed in mean (n = 8-10/group, except n = 18 in vehicle group) ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 as compared to respective vehicle group (deionized water) (Dunnett's post hoc test following a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA))|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: (a and b) Effect on speed (cm/s) of zebrafish. Speed are expressed in mean (n = 8-10/group, except n = 18 in vehicle group) ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 as compared to respective vehicle group (deionized water) (Dunnett's post hoc test following a one-way ANOVA)|
Click here to view
Effect on total mobility and immobility time
Effect on total mobility [Figure 4] and immobility [Figure 5] time of each fish was also evaluated for each treatment group and compared with the control group (867.54 ± 17.53 and 38.95 ± 17.53, respectively). The results of reduction in total mobility time and increase in the total immobility time in different groups correlate well with the decrease in speed and distance travelled. These changes were significant in clonidine (552.67 ± 59.02; 347.33 ± 59.02), pentobarbitone (583.50 ± 71.60; 316.50 ± 71.60), ramelteon (693.48 ± 76.23; 206.52 ± 76.23), diazepam (563.99 ± 71.17; 336.00 ± 71.17), venlafaxine (547.13 ± 80.16; 352.87 ± 80.16), and rasagiline (702.14 ± 59.08; 197.86 ± 59.08) group, respectively. Imipramine, caffeine, and scopolamine produced nonsignificant marginal increase in mobility time with decrease in immobility time compared to the control group.
|Figure 4: (a and b) Effect on total time mobile (s) of zebrafish. Total time mobile are expressed in mean (n = 8-10/group, except n = 18 in vehicle group) ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 as compared to respective vehicle group (deionized water) (Dunnett's post hoc test following a one way ANOVA)|
Click here to view
|Figure 5: (a and b) Effect on total time immobile (s) of zebrafish. Total time immobile are expressed in mean (n = 8-10/group, except n = 18 in vehicle group) ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 as compared to respective vehicle group (deionized water) (Dunnett's post hoc test following a one-way ANOVA)|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The effect on CNS behavior (convulsion or locomotor activity) in adult as well as larval zebrafish has been extensively studied using narcoleptics ,, or alcohol. ,, The present study provides the preliminary evidence that the adult zebrafish may be an excellent tool for early stage pharmacological and/or safety investigation of the new chemical entities for their effects on locomotor behavior and the possible involvement of different receptors and mechanism. To prove this we investigated the effect on locomotor activity of different category of established psychomotor stimulants such as caffeine (inhibitor of adenosine A 1 /A 2A receptor and phosphodiesterases); scopolamine (centrally acting nonselective muscarinic receptor antagonist with both psychostimulant and depressant properties depending upon dose); and psychomotor depressants, that is, clonidine (α2 agonist), diazepam (benzodiazepine), pentobarbitone (barbiturates), ramelteon (MT 1 /MT 2 blocker), chlorpromazine (antipsychotic), venlafaxine and imipramine (antidepressant), and rasagiline (anti-Parkinson) on adult zebrafish. As per our knowledge no extensive study has been conducted on zebrafish using these compounds.
To validate this model each fish was exposed into different drug concentrations for 15 min. The reason behind selecting the experiment duration of 15 min is on the basis of study conducted on the effect of alcohol in zebrafish. In this study, brain level of alcohol was estimated after 15 min of exposure and it was found to be 90% of the tank alcohol concentration.  By assuming the same achieved concentration with these drugs we exposed each zebrafish up to 15 min. Using zebrafish in the standard procedure, it is observed that out of 11 compounds tested, nine compounds decrease locomotor behavior as anticipated, while caffeine showed biphasic response and scopolamine did not show any changes in locomotor activity.
Clonidine, a known α2 agonist, inhibits noradrenergic activity by acting on presynaptic autoreceptor known to decrease locomotor activity in small animals. ,, The findings of our study are in line with above reported studies which support the involvement of noradrenergic pathway in zebrafish.  The effect of pentobarbitone, diazepam, and ramelteon (all are known sedatives) on locomotor behavior of zebrafish was evaluated. Benzodiazepines and barbiturates are known to cause sleep promoting effect to the loss of consciousness in humans and other mammals.  The inhibitory effect of conventional hypnotic agents (pentobarbitone and diazepam) are due to activation of GABA A receptors is the major mechanism of depressant/sedative action , which potentiate the rest behavior in zebrafish as we found in our study. It has been already reported that the brain of adult zebrafish has higher expression of MT 1 receptor than MT 2 .  Ramelteon is a selective melatonin receptor (MT 1 and MT 2 ) agonist promotes the effect of melatonin on sleep.  Our results of ramelteon in zebrafish showed significant reduction in locomotor activity confirms its action more towards through MT 1 receptor. To the best of our knowledge, it's a first kind of study on the effect of locomotion behavior of adult zebrafish using a selective melatonin receptor agonist.
Chlorpromazine a typical antipsychotic drug is known to produce extrapyramidal motor effects associated with blockade of dopamine receptors (D 2 ) in the basal ganglia. Preclinically however, one of the most consistent effects observed with the acute administration of chlorpromazine is suppression of voluntary behavior including motor.  Our results are also in agreement with previous findings in rodents showed significant decrease in locomotor behavior supports the involvement of dopaminergic pathway in zebrafish. ,,
Rasagiline is reported as a selective irreversible monoamine oxidase (MAO)-B inhibitor at low dose and inhibits MAO-A at higher dose. It has anti-Parkinson and neuroprotective action.  Villegier et al., observed that concomitant irreversible blockade of both MAO-A and -B, long exposure/chronic treatment, and accumulation of extracellular monoamines may be necessary to induce locomotor activation.  Selective inhibition of MAO-B does not cause significant changes in CNS steady state level of norepinephrine (NE), dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)). However, it has been anticipated that the used dose of rasagiline in this experiment caused unexpected decrease in locomotor activity in zebrafish. High dose of rasagiline may be causing blockade of MAO-A, which is responsible for most of the adverse effects of MAO-A inhibitors  or less systemic exposure failed to induce proper response to increase DA and 5-HT level which are required for hyperactivity.
Another class of compounds venlafaxine and imipramine, known antidepressants, has sedation and decreased psychomotor activity as the most common side effects of these drugs. Alterations in monoamine (DA, 5-HT, and NE) level are likely to disturb both psychomotor activity and mood.  Previous studies have shown that acute and chronic administration of norepinephrine transporter (NET) inhibitors and serotonin transport protein (SERT) inhibitor alone, decrease motor activity in rodents. ,, Imipramine is a tricyclic nonselective NE transporter (NET) and serotonin transporter (SERT) inhibitor, while venlafaxine is a selective NET and SERT inhibitor and a moderate inhibitor of DA reuptake that increases the level of NA and serotonin in rat hippocampus  and exhibits decrease in locomotor activity of zebrafish after acute exposure up to 15 min as expected.
Among all the tested drugs, scopolamine was the only one which did not show significant effect on locomotion as reported in rodents. ,, Loss of inhibition of mesopontine cholinergic neurons via muscarinic receptors is one mechanism by which scopolamine could increase locomotion in rodents.  In our experiment, nonsignificant increase in total mobility time and decrease in immobility time was observed with no changes in distance traveled and speed of zebrafish compared to control suggesting the probability of low systemic exposure of scopolamine that failed to inactivate muscarinic receptors properly.
In this study exposure of zebrafish to nonselective A 1 and A 2A receptor antagonist caffeine showed a biphasic response pattern similar to reported in rodents. ,, Significant decrease in locomotor activity was observed at higher dose which was probably due to A 1 receptor blockage and increased locomotor activity found at low doses was probably due to A 2A receptor blockage. 
Taken together, the data presented here describes that adult zebrafish is sensitive enough to different classes of compounds already known for their effect on locomotor behavior and opens further possibilities to explore the utility of adult zebrafish as a model for initial pharmacological and safety pharmacology evaluation of NCEs.
| Acknowledgment|| |
The authors wish to extend their thanks to the Ranbaxy Research Laboratories for the provision of facility to carry out the work. We are also grateful to Dr. Milind Deore and Mr. Pravin J. Patil for the expert advice and helpful discussions while designing the experiment.
| References|| |
|1.||Popoli P, Reggio R, Pezzola A, Fuxe K, Ferre S. Adenosine A 1 and A 2A receptor antagonists stimulate motor activity: Evidence for an increased effectiveness in aged rats. Neurosci Lett 1998;251:201-4. |
|2.||Wiley JL. Antipsychotic - induced suppression of locomotion in juvenile, adolescent and adult rats. Eur J Pharmacol 2008;578:216-21. |
|3.||Barros TP, Alderton WK, Reynolds HM, Roach AG, Berghmans S. Zebrafish: An emerging technology for in vivo pharmacological assessment to identify potential safety liabilities in early drug discovery. Br J Pharmacol 2008;154:1400-13. |
|4.||Goldsmith P. Zebrafish as a pharmacological tool: The how, why and when. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2004;4:504-12. |
|5.||Rubinstein AL. Zebrafish assays for drug toxicity screening. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2006;2:231-40. |
|6.||Winter MJ, Redfern WS, Hayfield AJ, Owen SF, Valentin JP, Hutchinson TH. Validation of larval zebrafish locomotor assay for assessing the seizure liability of early stage development drugs. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 2008;57:176-87. |
|7.||Postlethwait JH, Woods IG, Ngo-Hazelett P, Yan YL, Kelly PD, Chu F, et al. Zebrafish comparative genomics and the origins of the vertebrate chromosomes. Genome Res 2000;10:1890-902. |
|8.||Baraban SC, Taylor MR, Castro PA, Baier H. Pentylenetetrazole induced changes in zebrafish behavior, neural activity and C-FOS expression. Neuroscience 2005;131:759-68. |
|9.||Berghmans S, Hunt J, Roach A, Goldsmith P. Zebrafish offer the potential for a primary screen to identify a wide variety of potential anticonvulsants. Epilepsy Res 2007;75:18-28. |
|10.||Irons TD, MacPhail RC, Hunter DL, Padilla S. Acute neuroactive drug exposures alter locomotor activity in larval zebrafish. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2010;32:84-90. |
|11.||Zhdanova IV, Wang SY, Leclair OU, Danilova NP. Melatonin promotes sleep like state in zebrafish. Brain Res 2001;903:263-8. |
|12.||Best JD, Alderton WK. Zebrafish: An in vivo model for the study of neurological diseases. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2008;4:567-76. |
|13.||Tropepe V, Sive HL. Can zebrafish be used as a model to study the neuro developmental causes of autism. Genes Brain Behav 2003;2:268-81. |
|14.||Gerlai R, Lee V, Blaster R. Effects of acute and chronic ethanol exposure on the behavior of adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). Pharmac Biochem Behav 2006;85:752-61. |
|15.||Giacomini NJ, Rose B, Kobayashi K, Guo S. Antipsychotics produce locomotor impairment in larval zebrafish. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2006;28:245-50. |
|16.||Levin ED, Bencan Z, Cerutti DT. Anxiolytic effects of nicotine in zebrafish. Physiol Behav 2007;90:54-8. |
|17.||Macphail RC, Brooks J, Hunter DL, Padnos B, Irons TD, Padilla S. Locomotion in larval zebrafish: Influence of time of day, lighting and ethanol. Neurotoxicology 2009;30:52-8. |
|18.||Westerfield M (1995). The Zebrafish book. A guide for the laboratory use of Zebrafish (Danio rerio),. 3 rd Edition Eugene, OR, University of Oregon Press,:385 |
|19.||El Yacoubi M, Ladent C, Menard JF, Parmentier M, Costentin M, Vaugeois JM. The stimulant effects of caffeine on locomotor behavior in mice are mediated through its blockade of adenosine A 2A receptor. Br J Pharmacol 2000;129:1465-73. |
|20.||Dulgos CA, Rabin RA. Ethanol effects on three strains of zebrafish: Model system for genetic investigations. Pharmac Biochem Behav 2003;74:471-80. |
|21.||Lockwood B, Bjerke S, Kobayashi K, Guo S. Acute effects of alcohol on larval zebrafish: A genetic system for large-scale screening. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2004;77:647-54. |
|22.||Shinba T, Shinozaki T, Mugishima G. Clonidine immediately after immobilization stress prevents long lasting locomotor reduction in the rats. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2001;25:1629-40. |
|23.||Clineschmidt BV, Flataker LM, Faison E, Holmes R. An in vivo model for investigating alpha1 and alpha2 receptors in the CNS: Studies with mianserin. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1979;242:59-76. |
|24.||Delini SA, Baumann P, Buch O. Depression of exploratory activity by Clonidine in rats as a model for detection of relative pre and post synaptic central noradrenergic receptor selectivity of alpha-adrenolytic drugs. Nauny-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 1979;307:115-22. |
|25.||Rink E, Wullimann MF. Conections of the ventral telencephalon (subpallium) in the zebrafish (Dania Rerio). Brain Res 2004;1011:206-20. |
|26.||Roth SH, Samanani N, Archer DP. Mechanism for pentobarbital induced enhancement of synaptic activity may be similar to that for long term potentiation (LTP) in the mammalian CNS. Proc West Pharmacol Soc 1999;42:53-4. |
|27.||Savic MM, Obradovic DI, Ugresic ND, Cook JM, Yin W, Van Linn M, et al. Benzodiazepine site inverse agonists and locomotor activity in rats: Bimodal and Biphasic influence. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2006;84:35-42. |
|28.||Danilova N, Krupnik VE, Sugden D, Zhdanova IV. Melatonin stimulates cell proliferation in zebrafish embryo and accelerates its development. FASEB J 2004;18:751-3. |
|29.||Miyamoto M. Effect of ramelteon (TAK-375), a selective MT1/MT2 receptor agonist, on motor performance in mice. Neurosci Lett 2006;402:201-4. |
|30.||Simon VM, Parra A, Miñarro J, Arenas MC, Vinader-Caerols C, Aguilar MA. Predicting how equipotent doses of chlorpromazine, haloperidol, sulpride, raclopride and clozapine reduce locomotor activity in mice. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2000;10:159-64. |
|31.||Tada M, Shirakawa K, Matsuoka N, Muoth S. Combined treatment of quetiapine with haloperidol in animal models of antipsychotic effect and extrapyramidal side effects: Comparison with risperidone and chlorpromazine. Psychopharmacol 2004;176:94-100. |
|32.||Himmel HM. Safety pharmacology assessment of central nervous system function in juvenile and adult rats: Effect of pharmacological reference compounds. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 2008;58:129-46. |
|33.||Rink E, Wullimann MF. The teleostean (zebrafish) dopaminergic system ascending to the subpallium (striatum) is located in the basal diencephalon (posterior tuberculum). Brain Res 2001;889:316-30. |
|34.||Finberg JP, Yaudim MB. Pharmacological properties of the anti-parkinson drug rasagline; modification of endogenous brain amines, reserpine reversal, serotonergic and dopaminergic behaviors. Neuropharmacology 2002;43:1110-8. |
|35.||Villegier AS, Salomon L, Granon S, Changeux JP, Belluzzi JD, Leslie FM, et al. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors allow locomotor and rewarding responses to nicotine. Neuropschopharmacology 2006;31:1704-13. |
|36.||Mitchell HA, Ahern TH, Liles LC, Javors MA, Weinshenker D. The effects of norepinephrine transporter inactivation on locomotor activity in mice. Biol Psychiatry 2006;60:1046-52. |
|37.||Airhart MJ, Lee DH, Wilson TD, Miller BE, Miller MN, Skalko RG. Movement disorders and neurochemical changes in zebrafish larvae after bath exposure to fluoxetine (PROZAC). Neurotox Teratol 2007;29:652-64. |
|38.||Oliveira RA, Geanne MA, Borges KD, Bruin GS, Filho EA, Viana GS. The effect of venlafaxine on behavior, body weight and striatal monoamine levels on sleep-deprived female rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2004;79:499-506. |
|39.||Joyce EM, Koob GF. Amphetamine, Scopolamine and caffeine-induced locomotor activity following 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the mesolimbic dopamine system. Psychopharmacology 1981;73:311-3. |
|40.||Chintoh A, Fulton J, Koziel N, Aziz M, Sud M, Yeomans JS. Role of cholinergic receptors in locomotion induced by scopolamine and oxotremorine-M. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2003;76:53-61. |
|41.||Antoniou K, Kafetzopoulos E, Papadopoulou-Daifoti Z, Hyphantis T, Marselos M. D-amphetamine, cocain and caffeine: A comparative study of acute effects on locomotor activity and behavioural patterns in rats. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1998;23:189-96. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]